|
If the "invasion" by foreign races into Han territory at the Yuan and Qing periods were taken as invasion by "foreign countries", the Chinese, especially the Han people of Yuan and Qing dynasties, could well have become stateless slaves. If you do not recognize "co-existence of the five ethnic groups", then it means the Han people willingly admitted that they were "stateless slaves"? Then how are we going to record Chinese history? Therefore: the principle of "co-existence of the five ethnic groups" is the long-lasting fundamental principle for establishing the nation, it is very important. "Co-existence of the five ethnic groups" is also a historic established system, and should not be readily neglected. The Han people were known to bitterly hate "Wu San-gui" who led the Qing armies through the San Hai Guan, then why would they not allow Tibetans to bitterly hate the Han people who killed their compatriots? When the Manchurian armies entered Han territory, as they reached Guang Xi and Guang Dong provinces, they killed many Han Chinese who rose and resisted them. Today, after several hundred years, when mentioned, the elderly people still constantly bear in mind this "bloodbath feud". Thus mentioned is not intended to instigate ethnic conflicts. On the contrary, we have to show understanding for the "ethnic spirit" of Tibetan compatriots. Only through this can the psychological barrier created by historical events be dismantled, that the Tibetan compatriots can be united into the large Chinese national family. Therefore, ethnic issues should not be "treated lightly". Mao Ze-dong and Deng Xiao-ping left the Tibet issue to Jiang Ze-min. Please give Jiang Ze-min time. I believe Jiang Ze-min can handle this issue properly. |
|
|
