If the above argument is valid,

          . . . then, the Dalai Lama's exit to India, His enduring of all kinds of hardships, experiencing to the utmost the unfair and unjust life of an exile, could well be contorted as abandoning and turning blind eyes to millions of Tibetans in the snowy territory suffering from hunger and cold miseries, while Himself had gone to the "warmth" of India, pushing for "independence", "enjoying an easy and comfortable living".

          . . . The Dalai Lama, after forty years of "meticulous strategic planning", has successfully "invaded" the Western countries with Chinese civilization and the essence of oriental culture : Buddhist doctrines.

          After Dalai Lama and His like had successfully "invaded" the western countries, now that He is back transmitting His Buddhist "spiritual poison" to mainland China.  It looks as though Dalai Lama is really going to "poison the whole world".  It is only because of the power of immunity conferred by materialistic ideology that China could "keep herself undefiled and conserved".

          Taking it even further, extending into history, it is possible to mount a mass criticism at Ba-si-ba: It was difficult to fathom the intention of "Ba-si-ba", he dared conjecture and develop the so called "written language", he absurdly attempted to alter the "culture of our great Mongolian dynasty", . . . he used the religious poison unique to Tibet, to intoxicate we Chinese . . .

          "If this can be tolerated, what else cannot?"

          The practical experience gathered in the reform of the Chinese society in the fifties and the sixties can bear testimony.  Truth can well be contorted and reversely confounded if only one ideology were allowed to control the society.